![]() And in 1986 there would have been a lot of them still outstanding. Then again, the movie portrayed a Japanese company. Baker, which resulted in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 being upheld and an end to virtually all issuance of U.S. Holly, at a party held by her employer, the Nakatomi Corporation. Back in the 1980s, with a booming economy, many Japanese companies asserted themselves by setting up. Supreme Court in the case South Carolina v. Die Hard is a 1988 American action film directed by John McTiernan and written by Jeb Stuart. Die Hard: Nakatomi Corporation Nakatomi Plaza logo, Die Hard, 20th Century Fox, 1988. state of South Carolina was heard by the U.S. A challenge to this tax treatment by the U.S. In contrast, registered bonds retain favorable tax treatment. The interest paid on any such bonds issued after 1982 would not be tax-deductible by the issuer in the case of corporate bonds, and taxable income to the holder in the case of municipal bonds. In the United States, since the passage of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, the issuance of debt in bearer form has been substantially curtailed. In response, new issuances of bearer bonds have been severely curtailed in the United States since 1982. Posing as Nakatomi Plaza, headquarters of the fictional Nakatomi Corp. Bearer bonds have historically been the financial instrument of choice for money laundering, tax evasion, and concealed business transactions in general. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |